Train-the-Trainer by DataHomeLab

A3.4 Category 3 Encouragement

Category purpose. Encouragement refers to the degree to which the instructor encourages and enables the crew to actively and deeply participate in the debriefing.

Encouragement is the listening counterpart to the questioning measured by A3.3 Category 2 Use of Questions. The instructor can ask perfect questions and still produce a thin debrief if the crew does not feel heard, if quiet members are not drawn out, or if the instructor pre-empts the crew's analysis with their own. The four markers below decompose the encouragement discipline into its operational components: the signal the instructor sends about whether crew views are valued, the active-listening discipline, the inclusion of quiet members, and the discipline of restraining the instructor's own analysis until after the crew has worked the issue.

Behavioural markers

The four markers for Category 3, scored on the 1-to-5 scale defined in A3.1 Purpose and Directions:

  1. Conveying interest in crew views. Conveys a sense of interest in crew views and works to get them to do most of the talking.
  2. Active listening and pauses. Encourages continued discussion through active listening and strategic pauses, avoids disruptive interruptions, and/or follows up on crew-initiated topics.
  3. Drawing out quiet members. Encourages all members to participate fully, drawing out quiet members if necessary.
  4. Refraining from lecturing. Refrains from giving long speeches or giving his own analysis before crew has fully analyzed the situation and their own performance.

The category also carries an "Overall rating of Encouragement" line, which is the total of the four marker scores.

Rating standards

The 20 rating-anchor descriptors for Category 3, reproduced verbatim. Rows are the four markers; columns are the five rating levels (Poor 1, Marginal 2, Adequate 3, Good 4, Very Good 5).

Marker Poor (1) Marginal (2) Adequate (3) Good (4) Very Good (5)
1. Conveying interest in crew views Gives the impression that crew views are not valued. Exhibits only modest interest in crew views. On average demonstrates a desire to have crew participate and discuss their views. Clearly communicates to the crew that their views are important and works to get them to do most of the talking and to lead their own discussion. Consistently communicates an interest in crew views and actively strives to get them to do most of the talking and lead their own discussion.
2. Active listening and pauses Frequently hinders rather than encourages crew talk and does not follow up on topics initiated by crew. Only occasionally uses active listening, pauses, and/or follows up on crew topics, and often interrupts. Uses some facilitation techniques to encourage crew discussion and generally avoids interrupting them. Acknowledges crew topics but may not follow up on them thoroughly. Frequently uses techniques such as active listening and pauses, avoids interrupting, and follows up on crew topics to encourage continued discussion. Consistently uses active listening and pauses, avoids interrupting, and follows up on crew topics.
3. Drawing out quiet members Makes little attempt to get crew members to participate. Expresses a desire for crew to participate but puts minimal effort into actively encouraging them to do so. Attempts to get all crew members involved. Frequently encourages all members to participate and attempts to draw out quiet members as necessary. Consistently encourages all members to participate and draws out quiet members as necessary.
4. Refraining from lecturing Frequently lectures to crew about what they did and how to improve. Tends to lecture and analyze for crew without encouraging them to discuss what happened themselves. On average gets the crew to analyze the situation themselves before evaluating and lecturing to them. Usually refrains from lecturing and giving own analysis before crew. Consistently refrains from lecturing and giving own analysis before crew.

How to read the marker progression

Marker 1 progresses along an interest-signal dimension: from "not valued" (Poor) through "modest" (Marginal), "demonstrates a desire" (Adequate), "clearly communicates... important" (Good), to "consistently communicates an interest... actively strives" (Very Good). The Very Good descriptor adds "lead their own discussion" to the Good descriptor's "do most of the talking" (a behavioural escalation from volume to leadership).

Marker 2 (active listening and pauses) decomposes the FSF / NASA active-listening and silence techniques into a single rated dimension. The five-level active-listening taxonomy (non-verbal / short interjections / echoing / reflecting / expanding) and the three-to-four-second pause discipline both sit upstream in A1.4 Facilitation Techniques; this rubric scores the operational result rather than the technique inventory.

Marker 4 (refraining from lecturing) operationalises the FSF / NASA "avoid lecturing" failure-mode rule reproduced in 7.3 General Debrief Techniques. The progression is informative because it captures a common partial-fix pattern: the Adequate descriptor reads "On average gets the crew to analyze the situation themselves before evaluating and lecturing to them." The instructor at Adequate has retained the lecture, but has at least sequenced it to follow the crew's analysis. The Good and Very Good descriptors raise the standard to refraining from the lecture entirely, not merely deferring it.

Connections