The briefing, conduct and debriefing loop
Every instructional session is a closed loop: set the contract (brief), run the learning under the right instructor posture (conduct), then convert observed performance into durable change (debrief). Break any leg and the others degrade. A brilliant debrief cannot recover a crew that never learned how to participate; a clean brief is wasted if the debrief lectures over self-analysis.
Position
Brief: set destination, need, and participation rules
Content completeness for general instruction follows A-W-A-R-E (Aim, Why, Administration, Revision, Elements). For recurrent EBT, nest that content inside the six-element conversational briefing: introductions and rapport; confirmation that the lesson plan was read and that interruption is welcome; objective and silent planning window; manoeuvres validation review; further planning; conclusion with a short personal break before the device.
ICAO Doc 9995 adds the structural skeleton the crew must understand: develop and demonstrate minimum competency performance; enhance TEM; and know the session structure (evaluation, manoeuvres training, scenario-based training).
Rules that make the brief work:
- Seated conversation, not script recitation: check understanding with short prompts and eye contact.
- Put trainees at ease; make the support role explicit.
- For LOFT/LOS, plant the seed that crews should note issues for the later debrief agenda.
Conduct: phase-specific instructor posture
| Phase | Instructor posture | Link to the loop |
|---|---|---|
| EVAL | Silent observer; no training interruption unless forced; notes on behaviours and competencies | Creates the factual base the debrief will use; listening is observation |
| MT | Active trainer; practice critical manoeuvres to proficiency | Instruction-heavy; still debrief what was learned |
| SBT | Intervene when needed to develop competencies; adapt to weaker competencies from EVAL | Generates the CRM and TEM material C-A-L will process |
Technique selection during conduct is continuous: instruct when knowledge is missing or only certain answers are valid; facilitate when attitude, behaviour, and self-analysis are the target. See Instruction versus facilitation.
Assessment is continuous across phases: observe, record, classify against observable behaviours and competencies, determine root causes. Grading of competencies is completed after the facilitated debrief, not instead of it.
Debrief: outcome, self-analysis, transfer
Two compatible frames operate here.
General / line-oriented simulation (LOS) frame. Brief the debrief (roles, crew responsibility for content, rationale for self-discovery, confidentiality). Build a joint agenda. Structure each topic with the C-A-L model. Deliver through Facilitation tools: questions, silence, Active listening, video discipline. Match facilitation level (high / intermediate / low) to the crew. Confirm proficiency targets (understand through be proficient) against the lesson plan.
EBT nine-step operational sequence (recurrent modules):
- Five minutes pre-debrief reflection: praiseworthy item per trainee; one solid example per competency below level 2.
- Brief intro (purpose is learning) + result first (successful / additional training).
- For competencies below level 2: factual grade, missing performance indicators, specific session example.
- Confirm understanding; do not dwell.
- Short open floor for trainee topics (list only).
- Self-analysis: "What did you do well?" (refuse empty negatives) then "What would you most like to improve and why?" against competencies.
- Crew-focused facilitation on 2 to 3 root-cause learning outcomes (not a chronological review); video if it aids self-awareness.
- Trainee-led summary of what they learned; instructor summary follows.
- Reciprocal feedback on instructor performance (Blind Spot solicitation).
ICAO aligns: fair review on observed behaviours and facts; state success or additional training and effect on privileges; facilitated self-assessment; instructor feedback and specific recommendations; video only with consent and deleted after unless agreed otherwise.
How the three legs lock
contract and Aim] --> C[Conduct
observe and train] C --> D[Debrief
self-analysis and transfer] D -->|next session / line| B
- Brief without debrief: objectives stated but never owned by the trainee.
- Conduct without brief: crew does not know participation shape or success criteria; reverts to check-ride passivity.
- Debrief without conduct notes: opinion theatre; no indicator-linked examples.
- Debrief that skips self-analysis: instruction relabelled as "facilitation"; weak transfer.
- Skipping reciprocal instructor feedback: one-way inspection climate; instructor Blind Spot grows.
Training organisation framing (OM-D): this is a training loop, not a checking loop. Same observations, different job. The debrief exists to move performance toward standard and leave a clear path, not only to record distance from standard.
Instructor use (one-page run)
- Before: lesson plan + A-W-A-R-E (or EBT six elements). Safety brief. Seed debrief agenda during pre-LOS brief.
- During EVAL: notes linked to competencies and behaviours; LISTEN; minimal interruption.
- During MT/SBT: instruct or facilitate as required; still collect debrief fuel.
- Five minutes before debrief: outcomes, praise, below-standard examples.
- Debrief: result first; joint agenda; self-analysis; C-A-L on 2 to 3 outcomes; trainee summary; ask for feedback on you.
- After: grade after facilitated discussion; record remediation path if required; delete video unless agreed.
Connections
- A-W-A-R-E model. Content checklist for the briefing leg.
- Set and closure. Lesson-level set and consolidation that the brief and debrief must still perform.
- Facilitation. Primary debrief technique across the loop.
- Instruction versus facilitation. Phase-aware technique selection.
- Questioning technique. Pose–pause–pounce and open analysis questions across brief and debrief.
- Evaluation cycle. How grades and progress tests close the instructional loop into the next session.
- C-A-L model. Topic structure inside the debrief leg.
- Active listening. Observation and facilitation backbone from conduct through debrief.
- Johari window. Maps debrief work across Public / Blind / Hidden / Unknown; closes with instructor Blind Spot request.
- Evidence-based training. Parent methodology for EVAL / MT / SBT and facilitated debrief.
- Line-oriented flight training. Scenario type that most fully exercises the loop.
- Fault analysis. Root-cause work behind the 2 to 3 learning outcomes.
- Core competencies. What observation and grading hang on during conduct and debrief.
Sources
- Doc 9995, Part I Ch 7 (Conduct of evidence-based training). Full conduct chapter: brief structure, EVAL/MT/SBT, assessment, debrief, facilitation table, outcomes.
- 6.6 The A-W-A-R-E Model. Brief content model.
- A4.2.3 Conduct of Briefing. Six-element EBT briefing sequence.
- A4.2.5 Conduct of Debriefing. Nine-step EBT debrief sequence.
- 7.1 Introduction. Training-not-checking frame; brief/debrief pairing.
- 7.3 General Debrief Techniques. Levels, do/avoid, toolkit, C-A-L summary.
- 7.5 LOFT Debriefing - Introduction. Brief-the-debrief roles and expectations.
- A1.3 The C-A-L Debriefing Model. Introduction and C-A-L topic frame.
- A4.C Facilitation Guide. Why facilitation is the debrief default in the loop.